Send letters to Kevin Costner asking him to make a continuation of Dancing With Wolves. - Take up from "13 years later the Sioux surrendered to the white skins" -- 130 years later (1865-1995) the white skins had so ravaged the land and resources they took that in combination with the white skin way of buying and selling (or stealing) property, they reached a crisis of where to find enough white skin money to spend for welfare to indians, welfare to homeless mothers, welfare to large corporations, welfare to the friends of the elected representatives of the white skin way of government, and how to "balance their budget" and "pay their national debt"?
Then Dancing With Wolves reappeared as Speaking With Clouds to see if the time had come when any would listen, to how Kicking Bird and 10 Bears had shown how the way of giving help to others used by those who were here before the white skins, (receving first if you have helped others more), using the white skins way of speaking with clouds could be used by everyone on the Earth to solve their problems of taxation, welfare, balancing their budgets, ending debt, end ravaging the land they had taken from the Sioux or what has been stolen from anyone anywhere, to fulfill the creative promises of those who believe in the Great Spirit by any name.
Here is a follow up to your computer program piracy and stealing credit card and cell phone numbers story of a few days ago, --
-- that extends to a way other than cutting back and deprivation to solve the problem the United States congress and state legislatures are currently debating about a BALANCED BUDGET and the NATIONAL DEBT.
This news story should also be of interest to tax payers as income tax time is arriving.
This has been mailed to you or handed to you personally because radio or TV news and interview programs, and newspapers or magazines will not allow anything to be mentioned about what the other side of this page describes, book stores will not allow selling the book "Speaking With Clouds".
PROBLEMS SOLVED:
As a veteran news broadcaster or interviewer, if you decide what the other side of this page describes is not interesting enough to be a new story or a discussion or interview subject, could you send a postcard or email to the address below briefly mentioning why you feel it does qualify as worthy of news mention or discussion.
News story: INTERNET - HOMO NET, Flood disaster solution.
To: News room, talk show or interview program.
Why is it with the flood disasters in California that news, interview programs, or telephone call in programs will not allow any mention of what is described on the other side of this page?
Why is it this either mailed or on INTERNET, that no one will respond or comment on this in any way, agree, disagree, ask for more details, give an indication read or heard even if no comment?
Isn't a solution to the California flood disasters worthy of a comment by at least some of the people experiencing the disaster?
If you will not allow this to be mentioned on your news or interview program, or you will not invite a speaker to your computer lab, college or other group, or will not discuss this with people you know to spread news about it by word of mouth, could you send a postcard or letter to the address below mentioning why you think what the other side of this page describes is not interesting enough to be news or a discussion subject.
A. Brown
Box 11131
Portland OR 97211
1-503-282-1648
Note Mr brown passed away January 2000. Please
address all inquiries to
akwu@canuck.com
Go to next selection 43 Internet users save human civilization
Go to Contents
Last update March 10, 1998