Friday Aug 4-95
Reply to question asked by Alan WU
akwu@canuck.com
underlined words are www HTML links
You keep repeating you do not understand the theory I describe.
It appears to me that what you do not understand is that the "theory" IS NOT about "overcoming death" to use your words.
The theory I am describing is how to END OR AVERT DESTRUCTION, of which "death" is simply one of many different ways to test the theory to see if it works.
The "theory" I describe of which "overcoming death" is a maxed out limit way of testing the theory to see if it is valid, is that all of the universe is not a system of force overpowering force acton-reactions, that can be described and understood by the ideas of purposeless statistical probability, equalism reasoning based arithmetic (find out what is unknown by discovering what it is "equal to" in the known. A major way used by the rules of equalism reasoning arithmetic to "find out what is unknown" by "equating an unknown to the known", is to determine what something that is different from something else can be multiplied or divided by to "make it equal to something it is not really equal to", so that such "equals" can be crossed out of numerators and denominators in algebraic "equations"), --
-- but rather that the universe is a system of interacting resonations or repeating events. Thus the "arithmetic" to understand how the universe works should be modeled on the properties of resonation phenomena, and not upon the properties of a mass proceeding in a straight line until it smashes into something by the principles of purposeless statistical probability.
The overall characteristic or "property" of resonation phenomena is arranging repeating events in graduated magnitude arrangements from larger to smaller.
A inherent property of "predictability" is also an integral part and implication of "resonation", (predictable time of repetition of an observed repeating event, "intelligence"), instead of the inherent property of force overpowering force physics of purposeless statistical probability.
"Predictability" phenomena tends to produce the sensation when processed by a human emotional system, of "detecting intelligence", or "identifying what is sensed as a repeating event (resonation) as an evidence of intelligence" or that what is repeating has been "caused by or designed by intelligence", (instead of taking place by purposeless statistical probability accident, that is to say no "intelligence" indicated). This apparently explains what is God?, and why a substantial portion of human civilization says it "believes in God", or "a supreme intelligence", and "in the day of the seventh angel 29 the mystery of God will be ended" (Rev. 10:7). Repeating events are no less "intelligence" on a universe level than they are on individual person "image of God" level.
A follow on observation from the simple beginning idea of "difference arranging from larger to smaller" is that something with a larger number of differences arranged from larger to smaller is a more complex form of being than something that consists of a smaller number of differences arranged from larger to smaller.
One can then suggest that if the universe and everything in it is a collection of difference arrangements from larger to smaller, and the more differences something has arranged the more complex "or higher the order of difference arrangement" it is, that apparently "the purpose" of the system called "the universe" is "to engage in difference arranging" (instead of things smashing into each other by the principles of purposeless statistical probability). What is this thing we have encountered (the universe)? It appears to be a repeating events difference arranging from larger to smaller device.
"Engaging in difference arranging" (adding more and more differences to difference arrangements") from a human emotional point of view and with human language sounds and ideas, is apparently also what humans refer to as "creation".
Conversely, from a human emotional point of view, something that has undergone a process of fewer instead of more differences being arranged over a time period of observation, tends to be given the human emotional title "destruction", or "deterioration or destruction is happening instead of creation".
Examining the mechanical structure of "difference arranging" from larger to smaller to observe properties of the process, reveals that what seems to happen when "fewer" instead of "more" differences are arranged over an observation time period, is that improper or mixed up difference arranging has happened. Large magnitudes are mixed in with small magnitudes, small mixed in with large magnitudes or omitted. The result is a "difference arrangement" breaking, or breaking down at the positions of the difference arranging mistakes.
The preceding outlines a general theory of "the purpose of being" (creation) how and why creation or destruction takes place (correct or incorrect difference arranging), and thus "how to end or avert destruction", (understand how difference arranging takes place, correct areas where difference arranging mistakes are taking place).
Observing currently accepted human ideas of "what is logical" and "how to solve problems" (destruction or predicted destruction), one of the most widely accepted human ideas of "what is logical" is that if you encounter a problem of some kind (destruction or predicted destruction), it must have a cause. Thus, logically, if you remove the cause of a problem, the problem will cease to exist. This leads to the next "logical" action in such a view of "problems" which is, look for who or what is causing a problem, destroy the cause or the people causing the problem, and the problem will be solved (the destruction will end).
Such "logic" violates one of the fundamental principles of a resonating in harmony, difference arranging view of being. The basic principle violated is that "difference arranging" in nature is not a process of discovering what to leave out of a difference arrangement, (or "destroy" as humans put it in emotional terms), but rather how to arrange EVERYTHING detected some place in a difference arrangement.
"Destruction" by difference arranging theory or resonation in the universe theory is not caused by something you should get rid of being included in a difference arrangement, but rather by arranging something in an improper place in a difference arrangement. Such an idea is alluded to in the currently accepted scientific idea called "conservation of mass and energy". Or in simpler terms, you can't get rid of anything in nature, all you can do is change something's form and position. "Burning wood" in a closed laboratory experiment environment shows the same "weight" of the components of the burning before and after the burning, separated instead of combined hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen or "hydrocarbons" plus an energy factor of "heat", but "conservation of mass and energy" is not considered so far in current ideas in force overpowering force physics to be an example of a fundamental property of difference arranging.
Turning to tests of the validity of difference arranging theory (destruction is caused by improper difference arrangements, of which mixing up magnitudes or leaving magnitudes out of a difference arrangement are the two principal ways to produce a misarranged difference arrangement), we can observe that in destruction caused by or encountered in human business transactions, there is the constant difference arranging violation of treating something as if it is "equal to" something else, (exchange or trade "equal values" to buy something), and basing the receiving of something out of life as a human on something that does not include the whole total of differences that a human memory and emotional system has added up and arranged as the total of what one has put into life (all of the differences one has arranged to arrive at a point where one receives something out of life).
As a test experiment to test the validity of difference arranging theory or "Resonation Physics" (that claims it shows the cause of and how to end or avert destruction by realizing what "the purpose of being" is in the universe, creation, that is to say difference arranging from larger to smaller), -- as a test experiment, try designing a human business procedure that is not based on the difference arranging violation of trying to treat something as if it is equal to something else 21 (not based on trading "equals"), and instead is based on the arrangement of all of the differences in the whole life of a participant in human business procedure, instead of basing distribution on only a fraction of all of the differences a person has arranged in one's life, ("buying something" by trading an "equal" called five dollars, if one is paid five dollars a hour for the work one puts into life, is based on what one has done in one hour of one's life, instead of the total of all of the differences one has arranged in one's life). Test to see if such a business procedure can be understood easier, seems more fair, and produces fewer conditions of destruction by participants in such a Resonation Physics test experiment. (Test to see how many problems are solved of current human equalism trading based procedures).
The preceding long paragraph and long mouthful (that perhaps some might say "they do not understand"), can be greatly simplified and understood by calling it "status system distribution", and observing the "status position distribution" that is used by all other life forms on the Earth except humans, and noting in particular that status is not lost when something is received by an individual in status system distribution. In human terms, one's "status position" is not spent, traded, given away, or taken away from someone because a person has received something out of a human business system, (received food, clothing, shelter, luxuries from a human production and distribution system).
Briefly, as an experiment, see if the same model (difference arranging distribution) can be described for human business procedure that is used for distribution in all other life forms on the Earth (status system distribution).
Discussion of the operating details of such a human business procedure can be examined at the Internet www Location or URL http://teleport.com/aab
Turning to another place other than human business procedure where humans feel destruction is encountered, and where it might be interesting to test the ideas of "Resonation Physics" that claims it shows how to end or avert destruction where ever it is encountered in the universe, getting closer to home than the universe for humans on the Earth, and as a matter of fact to someone "dying" in a home, or automobile accident, or some other "cause" of death: what does "Resonation Physics" have to say about "ending or averting the seeming destruction that is death?"
Referencing the ground covered and expounded upon by many others for thousands of years, one can on Internet www or other reference sources see what has been claimed or speculated about for thousands of years that (1) a human body and (2) a human memory of experiences or "soul" are two separate and distinct parts of being a human form of life.
Now we get to the arguing arena of "being human" of what is more important, the physical fact or mass of one's body, or the so far somewhat elusive specific nature of or location of one's "memory of experiences"?
Although it has been claimed dogmatically by religions and people interested in metaphysics for thousands of years that one's "soul", "memory of experiences", personality, can be separated from the physical mass that is a person's body, and such claims seemingly supported by the observational evidence of "contacting the spirits of people who have died in seances, visions, devices such as Weegie boards, etc, as well as individuals who claim they remember being someone else in the past, it was not until the discovery of how to accomplish radio wave broadcast and receiving phenomena about 100 years ago in the 1880's to 1890's that a testable, provable, physical phenomenon became known that can provide the mechanism whereby "separation of body and memory of experiences" into two separate and distinct phenomena could be understood and explained.
The issue of "overcoming the destruction that is death" thus became a relatively simple and easy to understand matter of examining and coming to understand the properties of "resonation" as such ideas are used in humans constructing radio broadcasting and receiving devices, and imagining that a human being is a radio-like broadcasting and receiving device (resonating in harmony difference arranging device), produced by the processes of nature instead of a human designed radio broadcasting and receiving device.
After about 100 years ago it did not take long for humans to fill in areas of "resonation" higher and lower than the repeating events detected as "radio waves", which came to be known as "the electro magnetic spectrum".
Something not yet accepted by current "action-reaction, force overpowering force, equalism reasoning based physics (instead of difference arranging based physics), is that "resonation" (repeating events phenomena) can be extended to periods of event repetition of much longer duration between repetitions than what is currently accepted as being the lower limit of the electromagnetic spectrum, and, that there is no apparent reason so far (no good reason other than perhaps religious dogma), not to treat repeating events of long duration (seconds to minutes to hours to years to centuries to millennia) the same way and having the same properties as resonation in the area of the electromagnetic spectrum where radio waves are located, or the area of the electromagnetic spectrum where light waves are located.
Thousands of years of observations and records keeping by both astronomers and astrologers (repeating events in the heavens and repeating events in the lives of humans), have provided a vast data base to test to see if it has inherent in it the same properties that have been observed to be those of "resonation" at the repeating events frequencies of radio, TV, and light or "the visible spectrum" (interacting resonation whether at the frequencies of light or radio-TV, or the human physical actions frequencies of minutes to years (Astrology). Are the "observation of a shape at a particular hour" diagrams or "hour scopes" or "horoscopes" of astrologers simply a mathematical stylization of how to draw the shape of a radio or TV wave broadcasted and received by a radio or TV device produced by the processes of nature, that is to say a human?, and does such a "resonation" have the same properties as resonation at radio, TV, and light repeating events (resonation)?.
Thus as one of the tests that can be made of "Resonation Physics" to see if it shows 30 "how to overcome death", (end or avert the seeming destruction that is death), is to see if it can show how to keep a human from "dying". It appears to fail the test if one insists the theory has not been proved valid unless it shows how a human body that weighs a certain number of pounds can be kept from wearing out, malfunctioning, or "dying" for as long as desired, say several hundred or thousand years (an evaluation of a mass, that is to say a human body, using the ideas of force overpowering force physics).
If on the other hand one is willing to think of (1) a "human body" and (2) a "human personality or memory of experiences" as two separate and distinct phenomena, and that a human body acting as if it is a person who has a personality and remembers experiences it has experienced as thoughts and actions in which the body has engaged that is being activated or "run" by a "memory of experiences", then the "problem of destruction of overcoming whatever is death" becomes no more complicated in terms of basic process than what do if your TV set falls off a table and breaks ("dies"). Solution to that "problem of destruction or death", go down to a home appliances store, Radio Shack, or electronic devices store and buy another TV. Tune it in to the same wave shape of repeating events phenomena as the TV that fell off a table and "died", and you will experience the human emotion of the new TV continuing on with the same "memory of experiences", "repeating events", "resonation", "channel", or "same TV broadcasting station" as the TV that "died".
Did you "conquer the death of the TV" by bringing it back to "life"? No. So does that show Resonation Physics is an invalid theory of the nature of being because it did not bring the "dead TV back to life". From a human emotional point of view (instead of how much does an "alive or dead body" weigh, action-reaction, force down equaling force pushing up view of being, etc.), its material body weighing a certain number of pounds was unimportant. It was the "personality", "soul", "memory of experiences", "resonation", "channel it was tuned into" that is important from a human emotional point of view.
Or phrasing "ending or averting the destruction that is human death" in a different way, would it really make that much difference to a person if one felt one was alive in a wrecked, worn out body, lying dying in a hospital, or perhaps being pulled out of an automobile wreck and "about to die", and then one started to feel perhaps in the same hospital where the dead body was taken or maternity ward in the same hospital as if one was in a different or new body not sick, worn out, or injured to the point of death? Would it really be worth getting into an argument that "Resonation Physics" is not a valid theory, because what it actually does is show how to tune a person's memory of experiences into a different alive body, instead of keeping an old, sick, worn out body alive for hundreds or thousands of years?
What's wrong with getting an improved new model body every so often, if you remember being the same memory of experiences or "soul" through a succession of new model bodies whenever the occasion arises of needing a new model (dying)?
Addressing the question of "how does a subsequent body tune into the wave shape broadcasted by a body that lived at some time in the past" to produce the sensation of seeming to remember being that person at a past time? -- this involves the question not yet agreed upon by current science which is: does electromagnetic resonation phenomena "travel at a speed" such as "the speed of light"?, or is electromagnetic resonation something that does not travel anywhere at any speed, and is instead something going up and down (resonating) in one place, and it is "information" consisting of the illusion of traveling at a "speed of the wave crests" of something going up and down in one place that creates the illusion of "traveling at a speed"?
Einstein and practically all of current science agrees with Einstein, and Michelson-Morley that light "travels at a speed".
I suggest the "speed" is an illusion like seeming to see "waves at an ocean beach traveling at a speed toward the beach, when as the birds, seals, or seaweed floating near the shore demonstrate, the water is moving up and down in one place instead of "waves traveling at a speed".
The "information" (amplitudes or wave crests) is what appears to be traveling at a speed, not the medium that is transmitting the information. Furthermore, as in a large "Sunami wave", "traveling" at over a hundred miles an hour near Japan when an undersea earthquake takes place, by the time the "wave" reaches the shore of California or Oregon it is a little wave a few inches high "traveling" at walking speed, or in other words it is a tired wave that has slowed down that has been traveling a long distance from Japan to California across the Pacific Ocean.
The same condition applies to repeating events phenomena (waves) in the repeating events range of "light" which thus suggests that "the universe is not expanding" as supposedly shown by "the red shift" in light from increasingly distant stars or galaxies, and that the universe did not start with a "big bang" at a specific time in the past (calculated by working increasingly distant stars assumed doppler effect red shift ideas backward to their time of no red shift).
Instead of a "Big Bang" at the time in the past indicated by calculating "red shift" positions backward, there could instead be "continual creation of new mass" in the universe by the processes of "repeating events difference arranging", as strongly suggested by information that is currently being gathered by the Hubble Earth orbiting telescope. Thus the "red shift" can also be explained by slowing down or tired light, instead of by a doppler effect from a resonation source traveling away from a point of observation. It could be that "there is no free lunch" in the universe (no perpetual motion) applies as much to "the speed of light" as it does to all other conditions anywhere in the universe. Increasing speed at greater distances is the principal clue to "tired light" instead of a "universe exploding".
If "resonation" phenomena is "something going up and down in one place" this means it is possible to come back at some later time and "tune into" what is still going up and down in the same place that it was at some time in the past, and thus produce the sensation in a human being of seeming to remember being someone who lived at some time in the past. Examination of the properties of resonation in the repeating events range of "light" seems to indicate that once a "resonation shape" is established in the electromagnetic medium in which the universe is floating, that the shape persists or can be detected for as long a time as several million years (substantially longer time period than the life span of a single alive human body). If such a property also is found in "human memory of experiences or "specific personality" or "soul" resonation frequencies (the data base assembled by thousands of years of doing "astrology"), then the mechanism has been realized of how a later body can experience the sensation of remembering being someone in a previous body, that is to say "conquering death".
The details of how to do such a procedure on purpose (cause a specific body to remember being a specifically selected person in the past, instead of such remembering taking place by statistical accident (now and then someone seeming to remember being someone picked at random out of the huge grab bag of everyone who has lived in the past), is what has been developed by thousands of years of comparing the shape of the resonating shape a person broadcasts and receives on to the pattern of repeating events of a person's life, or to use the older name for such a procedure "Astrology". Or in other words an "Astrological horoscope" that is to say a depicting by various arithmetic stylizations of a selected hour (hour view or hour scope), such as the "hour" (horo or time) a person is turned on the first time as a difference arranging broadcasting and receiving device (inhales and exhales one first breath, born, umbilical cord severed), is a statement similar to an "equalism reasoning arithmetic statement", but is depicting a "resonating spherical volume" based arithmetic "measurement" of a condition in nature, instead of a traveling along straight lines, Cartesian Coordinates, equalism reasoning arithmetic based measurement of a condition in nature. Correcting a mistake on your home page, I say the shape of the 544 tear drop shaped resonating cavity surrounding the Earth is what an indiviual resonates with, and not just the small part of the resonating cavity that is the "Van Allen Radiation Belt". Also see 35 Epilog.
As for "comparing A. Brown to Einstein" (an obscure implication a viewer is supposed to infer from one of the HTML links on your home page), all I have said is that what Einstein observed can be explained better using "Resonation Physics" instead of "Force overpowering force moving at a speed of light" physics, and that the important and significant implications of what I have suggested (a "unified Renaissance man theory", Leonardo rather than Einstein would be a more reasonable comparison), --instead of a "unified field theory", is a theory that shows the purpose of being is creation and thus "how to end or avert destruction". "Ending or averting destruction" is not the area of Einstein's interests (transitions from mass to energy). My interests are practical application tests of "Resonation Physics" to areas such as destruction caused by difference arranging violations in 21 human business procedure, (transitions from energy to mass at a complexity level of human life instead of the level of the chemical element Plutonium), a new position for women ("the return to grace", see Women admitted to full membership in human civilization, and updating of a phenomenon observed for several thousand years called "Reincarnation" (seeming to remember being someone at some time in the past), but doing it on purpose (" 30 Resurrecting the dead") with a probable success of about 1 out of three tries instead of by statistical accident, ("Reincarnation"), that is to say about 3 successes per 100,000 tries. I have added nothing and no new predictions to what Einstein suggested; only suggested new interpretations of Einstein phenomena predictions based on light "not having speed".
I have, however, suggested a huge body of "predictions", see 23 "The Operating System Of The Universe", in a "Renaissance Man" frame of reference (be interested in and combine ALL knowledge humans feel they have discovered in all knowledge and actions disciplines at a particular time, (not just energy to mass or mass to energy conversions via properties of the difference arranging phenomenon called gravity aka "Einstein").
The "predictions" dealt with in the www home page http://www.teleport.com/~aab are in the areas of solving problems in human business procedure, women admitted to full membership in human civilization, (Mark 12:25), and conquering death, (put Einstein back in a new body on purpose to let him continue his work, same for anyone else doing work a "human body reproducer" (female human) feels was work and a life important enough to warrant a person who died being given a new body to continue their work that experienced the annoyance of their body "dying" while there was still work to be completed, and to enjoy "in Paradise" the results of their work. What could be a larger world shaking event? -- showing how to produce death in human civilization with atomic bombs (Einstein), or the 13 yin-yang opposite, how to conquer death or the long predicted or threatened "resurrection of the dead"? (Renaissance Man Resonation Physics).
For individuals who may say there is a contradiction in Resonation Physics that on one hand says it pictures being as not a process of purposeless statistical probability, but then a little later says that "Reincarnation" is a process that so far in human actions takes place by a process of a statistical probability of something happening about 3 times out of 100,000 (a nearly identical shape that a person broadcasts and receives on, and thus feels like one is remembering being someone who broadcasted and received on almost the same shape at some time in the past), it can be observed at this point that "humans" are no less a product of the functioning of the processes of nature (or "God") than anything else that can be observed as repeating events phenomena in the universe.
Thus "God" has apparently through humans as part of the instrumentality of the "planning" or "intelligence" that created and is still by "intelligence" (repeating events difference arranging from larger to smaller magnitudes), guiding the creation of what is currently happening in the universe, has succeeded after several million years of working on the problem of "Reincarnation" by a process of statistical accident, managed by one of "his" creations called human life, succeeded in "accomplishing the purpose of being" a little better by reducing the statistical probability of "remembering being someone else at some time in the past to a probability of success of about 1 out of 3 tries, instead of about 3 successes out of 100,000 tries.
Would a "human emotion" of success in one 1 of 3 tries feel like one did something on purpose (succeeded in reincarnating or resurrecting from the dead a specific person), instead of occasional parents (about 3 out of 100,000) feeling they have produced a "child prodigy", "genius", "incredibly intelligent child", "unusually gifted high achiever in some or all areas of human action in which it is involved", but they don't know "who" the genius is, or if they "reincarnated someone on purpose". They engaged in no actions as conscious choices to give birth to a "genius". That it is a "genius" seems to have happened by some unknown combination of events or "by accident", and they do not know who the "gifted child" or "genius" is, who may be simply remembering or carrying on a life it lived in a body some time in the past.
Alan Wu. I WOULD LIKE YOU TO STATE PRECISELY WHERE IN THIS DESCRIPTION IS SOMETHING "YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND".
I will be on the look out for a sloppy speaking habit that it appears a large number of people who speak English use either because they do not know any better, bad habits, sloppy word usage, or are trying to fool someone (lie). The sloppy speaking habit is interchanging the words "do not understand" and "do not agree". Repeatedly one finds people speaking English saying "they do not understand something" when what they really mean is that "they disagree with something".
Be precise in commenting on anything in the above to identify whether what you are commenting on is "something you do not understand", or "something with which you disagree" (such as disagreeing with treating resonation phenomena of longer duration than the repeating events range of the currently accepted electromagnetic spectrum as if such long duration resonation has the same properties as short duration repeating events phenomena).
If this is a file in a collection of replies to questions asked about the writings of A. Brown, who also used the author's name John Believer, or about computer programs accompanying some of the books by A. Brown (of which some of the programming on the computer disks was done by Alan Wu, the person to whom this is a reply to a question), or stand alone advertising computer disks about the writings or the Internet home page of A. Brown, a more detailed explanation of what is discussed in this question reply can be found on Internet, world wide web, with a Mosaic or Netscape browser, at URL or Location:
http://www.teleport.com/~aab email aab@teleport.com
or
http://members.shaw.ca/akwu email akwu@shaw.ca
Friday August 4-95 A. Brown
access Internet www http://www.teleport.com/~aab.
click on underlined words in this and other listings
Go to next selection 72 "Why only reincarnation?
Go back to Contents
Last update March10, 1998